by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 21 February 2010 @ 01:29 UTC

SOUTH AFRICA - Ubuntu is an operating system built by a worldwide team of expert developers. It contains all the applications you need: a web browser, office suite, media apps, instant messaging and much more.

Ubuntu 9.10 Desktop

Ubuntu is an open-source alternative to Windows and Office. It’s a free operating system for your office, home, or when you travel.

A faster, smoother, more beautiful Linux operating system with new features, fixes, and applications designed with you in mind. Canonical, Ltd., headquartered in South Africa, has designed this operating system with developers of applications in mind as well. There are fun tools that make it easy to write and deploy applications for Ubuntu.

And, the latest in innovative ideas, Ubuntu 9.10 gives its users a Personal Cloud for storing and sharing files and contacts with other Ubuntu users called Ubuntu One.

If you thought that being a free operating system was the best part, then you’re in for a treat. All the applications that come standard with Ubuntu 9.10 are free as well. And, as a bonus, the technical support that Canonical, Ltd. offers its customers is absolutely superb! Ubuntu 9.10 uses the ext4 journalizing file system, which means that Ubuntu is more stable and will be able to recover from inadvertent and unplanned shutdowns. Security with Ubuntu Linux could never be better since no antivirus software or anti-spyware applications are necessary to protect you while your on the Net. And, Ubuntu Linux is a true multi-tasking, multi-processing operating system that allows you to run multiple applications on different workstations (selectable by the user) or the same workstation simultaneously without fear that your applications will step on each other.

You can visit the Ubuntu Community and join the Ubuntu Forum to post and receive answers to your technical questions, or, even better, there’s the LaunchPad, which this author will assure is a life saver. I have never had a question in Ubuntu–from usability, tweaking the OS, application support, and system issues–that hasn’t been answered professionally and swiftly by a qualified Ubuntu user and technical expert.

Ubuntu 9.10 is first rate! Give it a try today.

Tagged with:
 

How Secure Is Your Password?

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 20 February 2010 @ 21:41 UTC

WORLDWIDE – When it comes to password security online, how does your password measure up?

How Secure is Your Password?

With most websites requiring you to create an account, do you find yourself in a bit of a pickle when it comes to inventing passwords? Many people use the same password for all their online accounts and often forget the password they came up with months ago. Hands up who doesn’t feel like banging your head against the wall trying to remember the password you created months ago?

Let’s face it – everyone has problems with creating and remembering secure passwords. These tips should be of some help.

Tips On How to Create and Remember Your Passwords

  • Use the first letters of a sentence that you will remember,e.g. “I have 3 cats: Fluffy, Furry and Shaggy” gives: Ih3c:FF&S, or “Bouncing tigers have every right to ice-cream” becomes: Bther2I-C.
  • Take the name of the website and then add your personal twist, like your height or your friend’s home address (e.g. “AmazonOceanRd6’2”). Avoid using your own contact details like your phone number or house number.
  • Remove the vowels from a word or phrase e.g. “I like eating pancakes” becomes: Ilktngpncks”.
  • Use a phrase from your favourite book and then add the page, paragraph or chapter number.


The Do’s and Dont’s of creating passwords

Do:

Mix letters, numbers and symbols, and use case sensitivity (upper and lower case letters)
The longer the better. Use passwords that are longer than 6 characters.
Change your passwords at least every 60 days, cycling the numeric values up or down makes the new password easy to remember.
Try copying and pasting at least some of the characters in your password that way keyloggers won’t be able to track your keystrokes.


Don’t:

Don’t use words or phrases or numbers that have personal significance. It is very easy for someone to guess or identify your personal details like date of birth.
Avoid writing your password down, use a reputable password manager to manage all your passwords.
Don’t use the same password for several logins, especially if they involve sensitive financial or other personal information.
Don’t tell anybody your password.
When registering on websites that ask for your email address, never use the same password as  your email account.

Malicious Software Infects Computers

By JOHN MARKOFF, The New York Times
Published February 18, 2010

A malicious software program has infected the computers of more than 2,500 corporations around the world, according to NetWitness, a computer network security firm.

The malicious program, or botnet, can commandeer the operating systems of both residential and corporate computing systems via the Internet. Such botnets are used by computer criminals for a range of illicit activities, including sending e-mail spam and stealing digital documents and passwords from infected computers. In many cases they install so-called keystroke loggers to capture personal information.

The current infection is modest compared with some of the largest known botnets. For example, a system known as Conficker, created in late 2008, infected as many as 15 million computers at its peak and continues to contaminate more than seven million systems globally.

Botnet attacks are not unusual. Currently Shadowserver, an organization that tracks botnet activity, is monitoring 5,900 separate botnets.

Several computer security specialists also disputed the company’s assertion that the botnet was a novel discovery. This type of infection is well known to the computer security research community and is routinely tracked by a monitoring system that has identified more than 1,300 botnets of this design.

NetWitness said in a release that it had discovered the program last month while the company was installing monitoring systems. The company named it the Kneber botnet based on a username that linked the infected systems.

The purpose appears to be to gather login credentials to online financial systems, social networking sites and e-mail systems, and then to transmit that information to the system’s controllers, the company said.

The company’s investigation determined that the botnet had been able to compromise both commercial and government systems, including 68,000 corporate login credentials. It has also gained access to e-mail systems, online banking accounts, Facebook, Yahoo, Hotmail and other social network credentials, along with more than 2,000 digital security certificates and a significant cache of personal identity information.

“These large-scale compromises of enterprise networks have reached epidemic levels,” said Amit Yoran, chief executive of NetWitness and former director of the National Cyber Security Division of the Department of Homeland Security.

“Cyber criminal elements, like the Kneber crew, quietly and diligently target and compromise thousands of government and commercial organizations across the globe.”

The company, which is based in Herndon, Va., noted that the new botnet made sophisticated use of a well-known Trojan Horse — a backdoor entryway to attack — that the computer security community had previously identified as ZeuS.

“Many security analysts tend to classify ZeuS solely as a Trojan that steals banking information,” said Alex Cox, the principal analyst at NetWitness responsible for uncovering the Kneber botnet.

“But that viewpoint is naïve. When we began to detect the correlation among both the methodology used by the Kneber crew to attack victim machines and the wide variety of data sets harvested, it became clear that security teams must rethink their entire perspective on advanced threats such as ZeuS.”

Half of the machines infected with the Kneber botnet were also infected by an earlier botnet known as Waledec, the company noted.

The existence of the botnet was first reported by The Wall Street Journal, shortly before the company issued its news release.

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 18 February 2010 @ 15:04 UTC

GOOD MORNING AMERICA – A friend of mine and I are both unemployed at the moment. Both of us are looking for work in order to stay financially solvent.

Tory Johnson, ABC News

But the truth of the matter is with the downturn in the economy, no one is hiring right now. The news would lead you to believe that this is easing up and the jobs are becoming more and more available. If they are, they’re certainly not coming my way. I have learned about a relatively new concept in job hunting that I find exciting and potentially promising, and I wanted to share it with others in my reading audience who may also be out of work and searching to get back on the employment roles.

Sure, if you want to sell insurance, you can find commission-based jobs, but don’t expect to find full-time salaried jobs with benefits or health insurance.

Well, that friend of mine who I mentioned turned me on to something that really has me sitting up and taking notice. It’s called Reverse Outsourcing. She asked me if I had seen a news story featured on ABC News’ s Good Morning America a few days earlier called Job Club: How to Work From Home. I had not seen the featured news story, but after hearing about it, I went searching ABC News’s website to find out more about this hopeful light at the end of the financially-troubled tunnel.

So, what I discovered in Reverse Outsourcing was that foreign companies are hiring American workers whose skills are only found in the U.S.

In the video, Tory Johnson explains how two companies: oDesk and eLance, popular online marketplaces, are bringing talented out-of-work Americans together with foreign employers worldwide who are looking for freelance talent to fill available job opportunities, and this hiring growth is accelerating. Both of these websites are free to join and you don’t have to pay a fee to get started. Once you set your hourly rate for work that you feel qualified to perform, then oDesk and eLance increase that hourly rate by 10%, which is the fee that they earn for landing you the job.

As Tory explains in the video:

“Sure, companies can — and do — hire low-cost workers worldwide to perform technical tasks and other back-end work. But in many cases, Americans have the edge when it comes to customer service and support, public relations, Web site content, branding and marketing to a U.S. customer base.”

In 2009, American freelancers earned around $15M working for worldwide businesses through oDesk and eLance. This year, that figure is expected to double as companies in India, Singapore, Germany, Israel, and many others seek the talents of unemployed Americans to fill hourly contract positions and fixed-price contract jobs.

I have investigated oDesk myself, built my profile online, added my work history, skill set, education history, and portfolio, then filled out my objective and saved it to the site. After downloading the oDesk software, my next step is to take a short online test to determine my competency for positions in the skill set that I have indicated I am capable of performing. The skills test is oDesk’s way of giving businesses more confidence in hiring freelancers with the skills for which they are seeking.

What is extremely important about oDesk and eLance is that you have the opportunity to seek out worldwide employers and bid on contracts that you want to work on rather than simply submitting a resume and waiting for employers to sift through thousands of resumes submitted by you and others until they find a freelancer who matches their needs. In other words, on oDesk and eLance, you can go after the jobs you want and the employers you want to work for rather than just standing by in the wings hoping for the best. You can work as much or as little as you want–earning as much as you want within your available work schedule.

So, please watch the video, and if you feel that you have talents that you could use to freelance and work from home–working for an overseas company–then give oDesk and eLance a try. It could just be the answer to your employment dreams.

RFID Smart Tags and Wal-Mart

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 17 February 2010 @ 21:09 UTC

WEAVERVILLE, NC – In 2003, Wal-Mart introduced RFID smart tagging technology to the supply chain industry by announcing that it wanted its top 100 suppliers to start incorporating the RFID smart tag microchips into cases and pallets of material that it shipped to Wal-Mart. Niemeyer, A., Pak, M., and Ramaswamy, S. (2003) reported that Wal-Mart asked these suppliers to begin using the RFID barcoding technology by 2005. However, what makes it noteworthy is that Wal-Mart’s suppliers wanted to do more than simply what Wal-Mart asked them to do; instead, they wanted to investigate using RFID smart tagging technology into their own products to potentially reduce their own supply chain costs. Another noteworthy mention here is that RFID smart tagging is better than traditional barcoding in that the smart tag not only allows shippers and receivers of goods to identify the products they ship, they also allow the industry to track these products during transit, determine when and where the products were manufactured, what components they consist of, and when they might perish (Niemeyer, A. et al., 2003). And, finally, RFID technology has been available for several years and has been used in such devices as tolling systems and security badges, but what makes this a new innovation of RFID technology is that due to the plummeting costs of the RFID microchips, this same technology is now affordable for use by organizations such as Wal-Mart and other suppliers/shippers of goods to incorporate into their products to reduce overall shipping costs. For example, in 2000, the cost of a RFID smart tag was around $1, whereas in 2003, the cost had dropped significantly to around $0.25 to $0.40 (Niemeyer, A. et al., 2003). Niemeyer, et al. (2003) cautions organizations that they should not become fixated on the reducing costs of tags as a reason for jumping on the “RFID smart tagging” bandwagon prematurely until they have assessed the overall cost of upgrading their Enterprise Resource Planning software to accommodate the implementation of RFID technology into their organizations, which could run into the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars in investment for large companies.

RFID smart tagging technology is different from traditional barcoding technology in that to read barcode labels with barcode readers, the barcodes must be in line-of-sight of the readers themselves and the information contained in the barcode is limited to electronic price code (EPC) information; not true with RFID microchips embedded in smart tags, which can be detected and read within a certain range of the chips, but don’t require line-of-sight because they are passive tracking devices that use radio frequency signals detectable several yards away from the scanner and the chips contain far more information regarding the product, its location, and its status. This radio-frequency transmission is similar to bluetooth wireless transmission today in that the signals are wirelessly transmitted by antennae embedded in the microchip to the RFID microchip reader (Niemeyer, A. et al., 2003).

RFID smart tagging has enormous implications for supply chain management. However, this same technology has equally important implications for other industries, such as the automobile industry, the medical field, pharmaceutical industry, appliance and clothing manufacturing, GPS tracking, home manufacturing, and utility metering just to name a few (Calloway, D., 2009).

A business case can be made for the use of RFID smart tagging in each of the industries mentioned previously because the use of these smart tags can allow individuals as well as organizations to track usage data and analyze this data to a far greater extent than ever before. The use of smart tags have found their way into such devices or things as toasters, clothing (that automatically adjusts the synthetic makeup of the apparel depending on the ambient temperature that is detected by the tag), electrical and water meters (to automatically report the readings to a central computer, eliminating the need for a meter reader but also collecting digital data for later synthesis and analysis), automobiles (for GPS tracking purposes), home manufacturing (to allow the home owner to track such things as electrical usage, internal temperature, lighting, etc.), mobile phones, drivers’ licenses, and passports. Embedding RFID smart tags in devices allow them to take on electronic identities that can be queried remotely or equipped with sensors to detect physical changes surrounding them. Eventually, through the advances in nanotechnology, particles as small as dust might be equipped with RFID smart tags and networked. Smart tagging allows us to transform static objects into dynamic objects capable of sensing the presence of other smart tagged devices surrounding them and allowing them to communicate with one another in a salient or even ambient fashion. More recent innovations in the use of RFID smart tag technology has found its way into the leisure and sports arenas with the smart tagging of skis for lift passes. But the most revolutionary and controversial use of RFID smart tagging that is under development and has already been implemented in some instances is in the tracking of animals (so owners can find lost pets) and in children’s’ clothing (so parents can locate a missing child). RFID smart tags are even finding their way into human beings through implants for medical reasons (so physicians can monitor a patient’s condition), and the concept of requiring newborns to have RFID smart tags implanted under the skin for identification purposes during their lifetime is being investigated. However, privacy, security, and personal rights are in question with the uncontrolled use of such technology, and it will require the investigation into the ethical, legal and governmental ramifications before smart tagging of humans becomes a reality. (Calloway, D., 2009).


References:

Calloway, D. (2009, October 12). Are You Ready For “The Internet of Things?” | The Chronicler’s Web. Are You Ready For The “Internet of Things?”. Retrieved January 31, 2010, from http://dancalloway.com/wordpress/2009/10/are-you-ready-for-the-internet-of-things/

Niemeyer, A., Pak, M., & Ramaswamy, S. (2003). Smart tags for your supply chain. McKinsey Quarterly, 2003(4), 6-9. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.library.capella.edu/ehost/detail?vid=1&hid=111&sid=d824aef8-4f43-4994-9797-84c4d454be3c%40sessionmgr114&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=bth&AN=11143695#db=bth&AN=11143695#db=bth&AN=11143695#db=bth&AN=11143695#db=bth&AN=11143695#db=bth&AN=11143695#db=bth&AN=11143695#db=bth&AN=11143695


Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline