by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 27 April 2011

WEAVERVILLE, NC – I want to invite everyone who visits my The Chronicler’s Web blog to also visit my Drupal blogsite as well. This blogsite is called “Let’s Have a Word.”

I think you’ll enjoy my Drupal blog because it is more technically oriented than this blog and offers a great variety of information, including information relevant to the Stock Market.

Please consider visiting my alternative blogsite today and create an account so that you can comment on the articles that you find there. Remember, you must use a valid email address when creating an account because your account info is forwarded to the email address you supply when creating your account. Also, the valid email address is used by the site admin to contact registered users from time to time. Your account password is encrypted with military-strength 256-bit Rjindal encryption, so, it cannot be compromised.

Discuss what you read in my Drupal blog on the Vanilla Discussion Forums. Consider signing up and becoming a member. We would love to have you. Thank you.

I hope to see you soon!

Dan Calloway
Editor-in-Chief, TCW

Tagged with:
 

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 22 April 2011

EAGLE, IDAHO – Michael Blankenship, fellow classmate from the Asheville High School graduating class of ’73 passed away yesterday at the age of 56 from an apparent heart attack while walking to his car after teaching a class at Boise State University where he was a tenured professor. Michael B. Blankenship was a professor at East Tennessee State University and had studied Criminal Justice at Sam Houston State University where he received his Ph.D. He had been married for 33 years. Mike’s son, Ian, reported the death of his father on Facebook this morning. We are all saddened by Mike’s untimely death and our hearts and prayers go out to his family. The Boise State University Department of Criminal Justice has posted a Memoriam to Dr. Michael Blankenship on their University Website.

Tagged with:
 

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 31 March 2011

PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY – A 12-year-old boy genius by the name of Jacob Barnett, who has a reportedly high 170 IQ–higher than that of Dr. Albert Einstein–seeks to disprove the current “Big Bang” theory, which is held in high regard by most leading scientists and physicists today, and offers his own theories as to how our Universe came about.

Jacob, who has been diagnosed with mild autism, has an elevated intelligence as well as an eidetic memory. At the age of two, Jacob stopped talking. Worried that he had some physical disorder that prevented him from speaking, his mother, Kristine Barnett, age 36, took him to a doctor to be examined. It was later that a psychologist determined that Jake has a form of mild autism known as Aspergers Syndrome. When Jacob started talking again he told his mother that he was working on an equation that would allow him to solve for the volume of his cereal box, which accounts for his persistent empyting of the box’s content onto their kitchen floor.

Well beyond his fellow classmates, Jacob attends Princeton University where he is quickly advancing beyond his current studies and what the professors have to offer him. From childhood, Jake taught himself geometry, trigonometry, and Calculus. His ability to solve complex mathematical problems with ease has astounded his college professors and his 18-year-old fellow students who look to him for assistance with math problems with which they often have difficulties. Jacob has told his college professors that when he grows up he wants to be a college professor and that he wants to write a math book that will help students to learn complex mathematics more rapidly and with less difficulty. Now, Princeton University college professors have told the Barnett family that Jacob has progressed beyond the educational benefits that he can acquire from traditional institutes of higher learning and that he should pursue paid research positions especially in the area of astrophysics.

One day, Jacob began to tell his mother that he had studied the currently-held theories expounded by Dr. Albert Einstein and World-renowned mathematician and physicist, Stephen Hawkings, and had come to the conclusion that their theories were flawed. Of course, he was talking about Albert Einstein’s General and Special Theories of Relativity and Stephen Hawkings’ theories regarding the Big Bang and how our Universe was created. Stephen Hawkings currently holds the title of Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge–a title once held by Sir Issac Newton–and is thought to be one of the World’s greatest minds today. Not sure whether Jake was talking nonsense or not, Kristine created a video of her son as he wrote advanced mathematical equations in grease pencil on their living room windows, and she took the video to the renowned Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton. The World-renowned astrophysicist and expert in the field of astrophysics, Scott Tremaine, confirmed that the theories that Jake was proposing were authentic and that his mathematics supported his theories.

Jacob tells his college professors and everyone else who will listen that the theories he is currently working on will expand upon the theories offered by Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawkings and are not designed to disprove them altogether. However, Jacob says that the problem that he has with current theories offered by both is that they do not explain the amount of carbon that we see in the Universe today if the “Big Bang” theory is to be upheld as the manner in which our Universe was created. Jake goes on to say that he doesn’t really care about the fundamental elements of Hydrogen and Helium in the moments that supposedly followed the Big Bang, but that he is more concerned how carbon was formed, which he states could not have been created in the quantities that we see in our Universe today if we follow the Big Bang model from the moment of the Bang until now. And, finally, Jake tells his professors and Dr. Tremaine that he can show that Dr. Einstein’s theories of relativity are flawed, especially in the area of the Cosmological Constant that was introduced to explain inconsistencies in those theories, and that he can prove this with a few mathematical expressions that he is working on.

I watched in awe yesterday when Jacob appeared on the Glenn Beck show on the FoxNews channel. Glenn Beck asked Jacob during the interview he conducted with him to go to the blackboard and prove that the infinite power series expression that had been placed there was in fact convergent rather than divergent. Jacob walked to the board and immediately started writing complex mathematical expressions as he spoke through the proof step-by-step. He introduced the Calculus concept of improper integrals as he walked through the process ending up showing for Glenn Beck and the general audience that indeed the infinite power series did converge. It was a remarkable sight to behold how seemingly effortlessly he approached the problem and how quickly he formulated the proof in solving the problem. It brought back memories of my own college professor, Dr. Jack Wilson, who always astounded me with the ease with which he could solve problems, especially those involving Calculus. Jacob made it look even easier.

If Jacob’s work on challenging the theories of Dr. Einstein and the theories of the Big Bang as supported by Stephen Hawkings comes to fruition, Jacob may be looking at the next Nobel Prize in Physics. What is certain is that Jacob will go on to accomplish great things in the area of astrophysics and in expanding our current ideas of where we came from and where we are going. Big Bang or not, it will be interesting to see the theories that Jacob Barnett brings forth and shares with the World. Whether we will be able to understand those theories is yet to be seen.

 

By DAN CALLOWAY
Published 23 March 2011

WEAVERVILLE, NC – I currently support three websites that I have created over the years. These websites were created using the latest (Content Management System) CMS and (Content Management Framework) CMF platforms for better security, scalability, and performance. The CMS platforms are WordPress, which is also referred to as a Desktop Publishing and CMS platform, and Joomla—the most popular CMS in use today. The CMF platform is Drupal and, specifically, Drupal 7. My business website is www.chroniclersweb.com, my personal WordPress blog is www.chroniclersweb.net, a project that I started a few months ago called The GECKO Project is located at www.chroniclersweb.org, and my personal Drupal blogsite is www.dancalloway.com/lets_have_a_word.

All of my websites are being hosted on the domain: dancalloway.com. My webhosting company is GoDaddy.com, located in California. Originally, when I setup my hosting plan with GoDaddy, I was using the Deluxe Linux 2GH hosting plan, which gave me 150,000MB of hosting space, unlimited bandwidth, 25 MySQL databases, and 150 email accounts. Since all but one of my subdomain accounts point to non-hosted domains, to access those non-hosted domains is made possible by pointing the subdomains to them. The DNS A-records still point to the same A-record used in my primary domain. Within the last six months, however, I started experiencing sluggishness in accessing my domain and subdomain accounts on the Web, as well as some of them becoming inaccessible at times due to the load on the server my domain is being hosted on, which is a Shared Hosting Server. If traffic to that server increases inordinately on that particular server, the server’s processor will become bogged down with server-processor requests and the result is either a sluggish or poor-performing website. If the traffic increases to the point of overload for the server’s processor to handle, the site will be totally inaccessible until the traffic is reduced sufficiently to allow the site to be acquired before it times out. This situation became unacceptable for me and, so, I went looking for a solution.

GoDaddy.com offered me a free upgrade from the 2GH shared server to the latest 4GH multiple servers for my Webhosting. I could still retain all the existing products that I currently maintain, the same Webhosting space and Linux operating system; the only difference was my Webhosting plan. Now, I have the Deluxe Linux-Web (4GH) hosting plan, which offers expandability, better server-side security, and much better performance.

Here’s a short description of the difference between the 2GH and the 4GH Webhosting plans offered by GoDaddy that I’m currently using:

2GH – This 2nd generation webhosting consists of one shared server hosting many sites using 2nd generation server architecture, which limits your resources, slows down the site if traffic increases, is unreliable, and not as secure. More importantly, if the server crashes or is taken offline, so are all your hosted websites.

4GH – The latest 4th generation webhosting uses multiple servers that host your domain across them rather than being confined to one server. So, if one server goes down, your site stays up. Moreover, because this advanced networking architecture uses multiple servers to host your sites, it also implements features like Dynamic Traffic Management (DTM), Dynamic Defense Management (DDM), and Dynamic Server Management (DSM). Cisco’s DTM concept uses server load-balancing and auto-adjusting bandwidth to alleviate site sluggishness and inaccessibility issues. The DSM prevents sites from crashing if one or more servers in the server farm crash or have power issues, and keeps your sites functioning at peak capacity even during traffic spikes with the ability to expand dynamically as your sites grow. And, the DFM concept ensure that your websites are fully protected 24/7 from intrusion by hackers, which block an estimated 3.3 Million attacks daily.

After moving to the new hosting plan, my websites respond almost immediately when acquiring the sites through the Web browser. In addition, clicking within the websites is performed much faster than I had seen in the past. This makes me very happy. The most important requirements that I have for my domain and hosted subdomains are that the site loads quickly, performs faster, is more secure, and is 99.9+% reliable. Migrating to 4GH hosting from 2GH hosting with GoDaddy.com has satisfied all my requirements.

Tagged with:
 

by DONALD CALLOWAY
Published 27 February 2011

CLARKSBURG, WV — We humans don’t think in terms of 1′s and 0′s so why should our computers do the same? From the very beginning of the computing age we have created our computers to do everything based on the binary number system, the “on” or “off” way of dealing with everything, and we’ve chosen to use electricity as the medium for passing data through our computing machine’s brain, it’s processor, to the final outcome. After all, electrical transmission seemed to be the logical and best choice since electrical circuits can either be “on” or “off” but not both “on” and “off” simultaneously; so the marriage between the binary number system and electricity has for many decades been one made in heaven for our so-called computing machines. In looking at the world in this way we have created machines that can compute, that is, manipulate these 1′s and 0′s of our machine’s world, the only thing our machines know, extremely rapidly to achieve a result, and we’ve cleverly constructed algorithms for our machines to follow in solving highly complex problems. But our computers can’t rationalize, that is, they can’t make informed choices among apparently mutually exclusive outcomes when any of the outcomes would be acceptable, just perhaps not the best choice for our situation from a variety of perspectives.

Is it just me or does anyone else think our present computing paradigm is flawed and thus seriously impeding our progress toward creating a machine that can truly think as we do? Since, as I said before, we obviously don’t think in terms of the binary number system, this conclusion seems likely. So, what is the answer? Out there somewhere lies a yet undiscovered, monumental breakthrough in computing that will give us the answer. The trick is in knowing how to construct a “thinking” architecture for our computing machines that is radically different from the present “computing” architecture based on the binary number system. In achieving this goal we must rethink how we think.

If our thinking mechanism is not binary, then what is it? Can we get any answers to this question from modern science? While it is true that present science accepts the fact that in the process of “thinking” there are electrical signals traveling to and through our brains,–we know this to be true because we only need to see what happens when we severe the spinal cord–what happens to these electrical signals that causes us to “think”, that is, have thoughts in a way that is far superior to even the most advanced computers of our time? To modern-day science, this is still an enigma wrapped within a riddle. So, how do we proceed in finding a solution? I believe that when we are able to understand how our minds work on a “computing” level, that is, how our brains function to perform all of the so-called “background processes”–such as regulation of our autonomic bio-mechanisms such as the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems of our bodies about which we are not consciously aware, that is, we don’t have to think about them,–then perhaps we will be able to construct a similar architecture to replicate that complex mechanism and then port it to a machine. If we can achieve this we will have constructed a computing machine that computes like we do but using a far less constrictive architecture than the one we currently use which is based on the binary number system. Perhaps this “new” architecture will lay the groundwork for a truly “thinking” machine, something that seems light-years away for a machine that is still computing the binary way.

Donald007 is a retired Navy LCDR and mathematician currently working as a supervisor for the WV Dept. of Health and Human Resources in Marion County, WV.

Tagged with:
 
Get Adobe Flash player

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline