by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 18 April 2010

WEAVERVILLE, NC – I have a wireless home Local Area Network (LAN) consisting of a ProLine 6100 DSL broadband modem/router, Cisco WRT54G 802.11B/G wired/wireless router (acting as the Broadband gateway and DHCP server) operating in the 2.4 GHz range on Channel 6, and connecting one Dell Inspiron B130 laptop wired for admin console purposes running Windows XP, one Dell Inspriron B130 laptop connected wirelessly running Ubuntu Linux 9.10, one Acer Netbook connected wirelessly running Ubuntu Linux Netbook Remix 9.10, and two MacBooks connected wirelessly running MacOS 10.6.3 (Snow Leopard).

I chose to configure my Home network LAN by bridging the ProLine 6100 Broadband modem so that I removed the router functionality of that device but retained the NAT layering of the resultant switch after bridging. The Cisco router was configured with no wireless security being applied but, instead, a MAC filter list was setup on the router with an access-list permission statement that allowed only those devices whose MAC addresses were in my MAC filter list to access the router and thus connect to my LAN. The MAC address is a layer-2 address that is hard-coded into every wired and wireless NIC (Network Interface Card) by the manufacturer and is unique. No two NICs have the same MAC address worldwide. With MAC filtering in place, if someone attempts to connect to the wireless LAN, if the MAC address of their wireless NIC is not resident in my router’s MAC filter list, they won’t be able to connect to it. This is certainly true unless someone is smart enough to spoof the MAC filter list. I always thought that it was too difficult to spoof the MAC address to access a wireless network but after yesterday, I’m convinced that someone with the right tools and skill set can do it fairly easily. So, what I thought was a secure network wasn’t really secure at all.

Yes, day-before-yesterday, an apparent attack on my home LAN resulted in our losing connectivity to our Broadband service. The network intruder was apparently able to reset my Broadband Proline modem/router (while bridged), and totally reconfigure my Cisco WRT54G router, eliminating the MAC filter list contents, which contained well over 20 entries for other devices in my home in addition to my PCs that access the network for communication purposes to other services. Fortunately, all our PCs run Linux or MacOSX 10.6.3 (Snow Leopard) and, so, the intruder was not able to breech security on those boxes.

It took me the better part of the morning yesterday to rebuild my home wireless LAN. I have bridged the ProLine 6100 once again, and rebuilt the configuration of my Cisco WRT54G router. I am back online but have learned some very important lessons as a result of the attack on my wireless LAN:

(1) Never underestimate the persistence of hackers or their abilities to breech a wireless home network. This includes your neighbors who might try to steal your wireless connection.

(2) MAC filtering on a wireless router to prevent access to the router is not as secure as WEP security for the network.

(3) Save your router’s configuration by backing up the Config.bin file and putting it in a location that you won’t forget so the router’s configuration can be easily restored from the backup in the event the configuration is destroyed. This will save tons of time in rebuilding your router’s configuration.

(4) Apply some form of network security, preferably WPA-PSK (Wireless Protected Access – Preshared Key) rather than WEP (Wired Equivalency Protocol) on your LAN to secure the network in addition to MAC filtering.

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 23 February 2010

The organization that I have chosen to analyze for data storage requirements in this article is Amazon, Inc., an online e Commerce business that sells, among other things, books, eBooks, eBook readers, movies, music, children’s toys, computers, computer accessories, electronics, home and garden supplies, automotive supplies, baby supplies, children’s clothing, shoes, sports and outdoor equipment, tools, and more. The kind of data that this company receives as data input and stores is primarily OLTP data from online customers who purchase goods and services from Amazon. Customer data, including customer names, addresses, financial billing information, as well as customer preferences that are stored on each customer. Among the data that is stored by Amazon is the OLTP data that represents specific product data and order data for buying customers, product and availability data on all products sold by Amazon, as well as shopping cart and wish list data for every customer that represents those products that customers are planning to purchase now or in the near future. Output data for Amazon is the generated product information, shipping data, and product tracking information for every purchase made by its online customers, as well as past order, shipping, and billing information on previous customer orders placed with Amazon.

The current storage system used by Amazon is the Amazon S3 (simple storage system). This storage system is a scalable, highly available, low latency system that is currently storing 6.4 X 1010 objects as of August, 2009 while offering a 99.99% uptime guarantee. Amazon S3 stores arbitrary objects up to 53 GB in size, each accompanied by up to 2 KB of metadata. These objects are stored in buckets that are owned by Amazon Web Services (AWS) accounts. Buckets and objects are created, listed, and retrieved by a REST (Representational State Transfer)-style HTTP interface, which is a style of software for distributed hypermedia systems, or SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) interface (Amazon S3, 2010) and retrieved using the HTTP-Get interface or bit torrent protocol.

Although it is not entirely known exactly what data storage arrangement is being used by Amazon because of its proprietary nature and since this information has not been released to the public, whatever storage capabilities Amazon uses, it appears to be quite adequate. Apicella (2006) indicates that a clustered Network Attached Storage (NAS) solution known as IQ developed by Isilon, Inc., for Kodak is preferable since it allows for greater performance and scalability, and is capable of handling much larger file sizes and storage volumes than traditional NAS systems. Utilizing a clustered NAS, such as IQ, would allow Amazon (unless Amazon S3 is already a clustered NAS) to take advantage of a centralized NAS and capability to handle the larger file sizes and storage volumes than it currently maintains.

The storage needs of Amazon, Inc., are anticipated to increase tremendously based on the storage requirements for this online company in the past. Amazon was storing roughly 64B objects of data in August, 2009, up from 52B in March, 29B in October, 2008, 14B in January, 2008, and 10B objects in October, 2007 (Amazon S3, 2010). Based on storage figures over the last 21 months from October, 2007 to August 2009, and the rate of increase in storage requirements per month, it would be anticipated that Amazon would be expected to require a storage capacity of roughly 93B objects by August, 2010, assuming the rate of change in storage capacity does not deviate appreciably.

References

Amazon S3. (2010, January 7). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 22:40, February 22, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amazon_S3&oldid=336444506

Mario Apicella. (2006, June 19). The New NAS: Fast Cheap & Scalable. InfoWorld, 28(25), 31-34. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com.library.capella.edu/pqdweb?did=1074492511&sid=1&Fmt=4&clientId=62763&RQT=309&VName=PQD

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 23 February 2010

Basic Network Attached Storage (NAS) for use in corporate organizations consists of a standard x86 server running a modified form of Linux or Microsoft’s WSS (Windows Storage Server). The server can have its own self-contained storage capability or external storage capability, which resides in its own enclosure outside of the server itself. In most cases, organizations also choose to have a secondary server to act as a fail over server in the event of server failure, and typically some form of RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) is established on the system of at least RAID level 3 (data striping across disks) or RAID 4 (striping with dedicated parity) to offer redundancy (Apicella, 2006).

NAS and especially clustered NAS offers flexibility to many corporate entities by providing expanded storage capacities for ever-expanding data needs and access. Clustering of NAS improves NAS performance and scalability in most cases and is preferable (Apicella, 2006). NAS offers unified storage solutions for corporate organizations through its offering of a common storage location for file systems and Storage Area Network (SAN) systems.

A big issue that a lot of companies have that may not be totally satisfied by NAS is the need to handle very large files across large volumes in an efficient and fast manner. As mentioned in Apicella (2006) when files grow beyond 16TB, they often must then be split up across several file systems, which introduces complexity and data vulnerability into the mix. One solution to this problem is the development of file systems that can handle larger files and access larger volumes. Apicella introduced the file storage system called IQ (developed by IQ Storage Data Management), which is designed to handle file systems 20 to 50 times larger and 15 to 20 times faster than most NAS solutions. Also, the OneFS was mentioned as a distributed network file system developed by Isilon Systems for handling of thousands of TB of data via the IQ storage framework.

In support of NAS, however, the development of file systems that can handle larger files and access larger volumes so that files don’t have to be split up across multiple file systems and volumes offers a viable solution for NAS to provide an equivalent data storage solution to most corporations at reduced costs. One such file system is ZFS (Zetabyte File System) designed by Sun Microsystems, Inc., a subsidiary of Oracle, that is both a combined distributed network file system and logical volume manager all-in-one with the capability of handling much larger files and ability to access much larger volumes. ZFS is a 128-bit file system, which is capable of handling 1.84 X 10 19 or approximately 18 quadrillion times the data of current 64-bit file systems. This file system was designed such that its limitation would never be encountered in the physical world (“Sun Open Storage,” 2010). Use of a file system like ZFS would be a solution to the current limitations of NAS and would see NAS as being capable of providing future storage even in today’s IT world.


References:

Mario Apicella. (2006, June 19). The New NAS: Fast Cheap & Scalable. InfoWorld, 28(25), 31-34. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com.library.capella.edu/pqdweb?did=1074492511&sid=1&Fmt=4&clientId=62763&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Sun Open Storage. (2010). Sun Open Storage. Retrieved February 22, 2010, from http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/open-storage/index.html

Tagged with:
 

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published September 19, 2009; The Chronicler’s Web

WEAVERVILLE, NC – Want to know how you can quickly and easily backup your entire PC running Windows XP, Vista, or Windows 7 or your Mac running MacOS 10.x, take a look at the video below and then visit ClickFree’s website to learn more.

Model HD1035

Model HD1035

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline