Wired Campus: 27 February 2010

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 27 February 2010

CHRONICLES OF HIGHER EDUCATION

East Stroudsburg U. Suspends Professor for Facebook Posts
An associate professor at the Pennsylvania institution was suspended on Wednesday for comments that she wrote on her Facebook page.

Learning From Culture Pirates
History shows that intellectual property is more complicated than either its creators or copiers care to admit, says Adrian Johns.

Here’s One Way to Curtail Web Surfing in the Classroom
In a moment of classroom theater, a physics professor at the University of Oklahoma freezes a laptop in liquid nitrogen, then smashes it on the floor.

Tagged with:
 

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 9 January 2010 @ 02:37 UTC

From Jill Laster, Wired Campus

WASHINGTON, DC - Facebook is friending college researchers — and helping pay for their education — in the hope that academics will help the company improve its popular social network.

The company on Friday announced a new fellowship program to support five doctoral students, who will be asked to work with Facebook developers to solve current challenges in Internet technology and social media.

Recipients will receive tuition and fees for the 2010-11 academic year, along with money for travel, a $30,000 stipend, and other benefits.

“We believe that the academic community plays a central role in addressing many of our most challenging research questions, and we created this fellowship to extend our involvement and collaboration with the academic world,” said Greg Badros, Facebook’s director of engineering, in a statement.

Applicants must be full-time doctoral students enrolled in American universities and doing research in fields such as the economics of the Internet, cloud computing, social computing, data mining, machine learning, and systems and information retrieval. Fellowship applications must be submitted by February 15.

Facebook has only planned one year of fellowships so far but may continue the program in future years, said Matt Hicks, a spokesman for Facebook.

The Wayback Machine

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 26 December 2009 @ 18:02 UCT

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – The Wayback Machine is an Internet archive project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that is building a digital library of cultural artifacts in digital form.

Similar to a public library, access to the Wayback Machine is free to the general public, historians, researchers, and scholars.

Institutional support for the Internet archive includes: Alexa Internet, HP Packard, Perlinger Archives, National Science Foundation, Library of Congress, LizardTech, The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

The Internet Wayback Machine allows site visitors to type in a webpage address and select from a list of available times that they would like to view the site in the past.  Over 150 Billion webpages are available through this Internet archive website, which has archived websites as far back as 1996 and as current as a few months ago. Keyword searching is not currently available, but this will be available in the near future.

Current developers and supporters of The Wayback Machine are support foundations, national institutions, libraries, and a number of other non-profit institutions.  By and large, decisions on what website pages will be archived for future access are adults with adult concerns and desires as to what digital records are important to preserve.  Now, these developers and supporters are looking to students and the general public to also contribute in this decision-making process.

If you’re interested in contributing, then visit The Wayback Machine on the Internet and join by creating an account.  While on the Website, type in a favorite website URL lnk to view the site as it appeared in the past.

I joined the site today, received my virtual library card, and gave the site a spin by viewing Amazon.com’s website as it appeared in 1998.  It was amazing to see just how much this site has changed in 11 years.

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 26 November 2009 @ 21:39 UCT

WEAVERVILLE, NC – A Geek leader’s narrative is among the most important tool s/he has in nurturing motivation among the geeks who work for them. Glen (2003) posits that “a narrative defines for an organization, department, or project team the sense of identity answering the ‘Who are we?’ question that so often bedevils groups” (p. 226). This definition helps to establish the boundaries that define the geeks as members of the organization, as well as their relationship with non-geeks within the organization or the customers they support, and it hints as to their very purpose as a group. The embodiment of a geek leader’s narrative is crucial, especially in motivating geeks. When a geek leader displays consistency between narratives and behavior, the conceptualizations and information of his/her narratives are validated, and motivation can flourish. Inconsistencies in a geek leader’s narratives brings both the content and integrity of the leader into question, which can create distractions and most likely will foster an environment of dissention among the geeks.

This author once worked for a geek leader whose embodiments of his narratives were always inconsistent and all too often lacked the credibility and integrity one would expect of a supervisor. Specifically, in group meetings, the geek leader would often say one thing, and then turn around and do the opposite. This inconsistency in his behavior and truthfulness was detected by the geeks as a flaw in his character and brought into their minds serious doubt about his ability to lead effectively. The geeks would wind up constantly having to question his motives and frequently remind him of what was said in previous meetings, and then ask him for clarification. As a result, motivation within the group was always well below expectations, and the geek leader was never able to elicit among his workers the trust, respect and unity that was necessary to become an effective geek leader.

In concert with Glen (2003), the geek leader for whom this author worked in the past set out with an explicit goal of building trust and respect for himself, but failed to acquire it. As Glen (2003) so aptly puts it, “the formulaic and forced behavior that often accompanies a leader’s attempt to build credibility undermines the authenticity of his embodiment of his narratives” (p. 231). Among geeks, the trust and respect that geek leaders wish from the ones they lead cannot be sought but only granted.  Instead, geek leaders earn the trust and respect of the geeks, which follows in due course, by consistently embodying the ideas and values of their stories.

Reference:

Glen, P. (2003). Leading Geeks: How to Manage and Lead People Who Deliver Technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Tagged with:
 

November 23, 2009, 04:31 PM ET
By Ben Terris; The Wired Campus

This article has been republished by DAN CALLOWAY in its entirety
Date and time of republication: 24 November 2009 @ 21:46 UCT

WEAVERVILLE, NC – Without her knowing it, a paper that Melinda Riebolt co-wrote while getting her M.B.A. was stolen and put up for sale. And, according to an article that USA Today reported last week, that same scenario has played out many times before.

The article discusses how some essay mills — Web sites that provide written works for students — surreptitiously steal work and then sell it for others to pass off as their own.

For the first time, however, those who find unauthorized postings of their work online may have a way to seek legal retribution. The article says a class-action lawsuit filed in 2006 is making its way through the courts, and one judge in Illinois has found a provider liable on six counts, including fraud and copyright infringement. That site is called RC2C Inc. and hosts at least nine sites that sell term papers.

Essay mills often provide their own written works.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes