by DAN CALLOWAY
Published 15 December 2009 @ 13:54 UCT

WEAVERVILLE, NC -  This article discusses social networking on Facebook and how one can go about reclaiming his/her privacy on such networking sites.

Unfacebook Yourself:

Sometimes, social networking is just a bit too social. If you’re feeling vulnerable on Facebook, the web’s biggest social hangout, you can easily take control over who can see your information.

Facebook gives you quite a bit of say over who in your circle sees what. If you don’t want to share any information anymore, the site also lets you remove yourself completely. Learn how to take back your privacy.

Go Completely Private:

Facebook’s default privacy settings are in the middle of the road. They make everything you do on the site visible to your friends, as well as the networks you belong to. That means, by default, your Facebook profile is not open to the entire world. Networks are cities, companies or universities, each of which could still be many thousands of people. So, the default privacy is fairly closed, but you can make yourself even more private.

Load Facebook’s privacy settings and click on Profile. You will then see a list of categories, such as profile or photos, each with a dropdown box to control who will see items in that category.

Your choices:

  • Everyone (choose this option only if you want to be completely public)
  • My Networks and Friends (the default)
  • People at main network and Friends
  • Friends of Friends
  • Customize

If you choose the final option, Customize, you can select the only friends setting, which is the most restrictive setting. In this case, members of your networks who are not your friends will not be able to see your profile. If you want to make some networks able to view your profile (say, your university or company), but others not (your entire city, for example), you can change the All of My Networks setting to Some of My Networks. You’ll then get the chance to select the networks for inclusion.

For even more fine-tuned control of your Facebook privacy, read on to restrict individuals or apply settings to a custom group of friends. (more…)

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published: 2009/09/11 07:12:20 GMT – BBC World News

WEAVERVILLE, NC – The world’s biggest social networking site has launched a slimmed-down version for people with slow or poor internet connections.

Facebook has said the Lite site will be faster and simpler because it offers fewer services than the main site.

Initially it is meant to support users in developing countries and where bandwidth constraints make the current version too slow to use.

At the moment it is only available in India and the US.

The company said around 70% of its more than 250 million users were from outside America. Countries in Southeast Asia and Europe are seeing a massive increase in growth where fast internet connections are more common.

News that Facebook was testing the Lite site was first leaked in August.

‘Twitter-like’

The options on Facebook Lite are limited to letting users write on their wall, post photos and videos, view events and browse other people’s profiles. There are no apps or special boxes.

“It appears, at a quick glance, to be a better site for Facebook newbies or for anyone who finds the current site overwhelming and noisy,” said Rafe Needleman at technology website Cnet.

“The new layout feels almost Twitter-like.”

Terence O’Brien at Switched.com gave the slimmed-down version of what he called “ol’ blue” the thumbs-up because it “strips away distractions”.

“The simple site loads noticeably faster, is easier to navigate, and is much easier on the eyes thanks to the lack of people sending you ‘virtual booze’ or asking you to join their ‘vampire fraternity’.

“The new layout seems like a direct challenge to Twitter, which can attribute much of its success to is simplicity and portability,” said Mr O’Brien.

‘Worldwide rollout’

Many industry watchers said they believed that even users with good internet connections might well flock to Facebook Lite because of its new look and ease of use.

“That is what some US users are planning to do,” said Eric Eldon of InsideFacebook.com

“Indeed the reaction from US users has prompted Facebook to release it intentionally for US users, something it hadn’t previously planned on doing.”

Mr Eldon said he believed a “worldwide rollout doesn’t seem too far away”.

Facebook has acknowledged this is a possibility in a statement on the site which said the firm was “working on translating Lite into other languages”.

So far those who have posted comments on Facebook seem to like the company’s new Lite approach.

“It’s good to see Facebook listening to their users,” wrote one user.

Another said: “Facebook Lite should be great for college campuses like mine that are hung up on bandwidth.”

Having no third-party apps on the site also garnered a fair amount of support.

“The no-apps thing is killer. There’s nothing about them I’ll miss,” noted one user, while another said: “Whatever you do, please, PLEASE do not allow the quizzes, games, or apps to ruin this pristine version of Facebook.”

Anyone who switches to Facebook Lite and does not like it can switch back to the fuller version of the site.

Source:  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8249835.stm

Tagged with:
 

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published September 6, 2009

WEAVERVILLE, NC – The term Web 2.0 has been on the scene since the late 1990s. Web 2.0 used to stand for anything on the Internet that was new. It received its first formal recognition as a new term at an O’Reilly Media Live Conference when Dale Dougherty adopted the name to represent those things that typified the post dot-com companies as opposed to those companies that did not survive the bursting of the dot-com bubble.

Unlike the former Web 1.0 platforms where Websites were static and Web browsers, which ran on PCs under Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, and Linux, took the Internet site visitor to a Website that ran HTML, and didn’t allow the site visitor to interact with the Website itself, Web 2.0 offers the Web as its platform. This new generation of Web 2.0 services runs on the Internet rather than on the user’s computer platform. Under the Web 2.0 concept, companies such as Google, Inc., offer Web services like Google search, ads, maps, and images wherein the Web is the platform—the user’s Web browser is assumed—and the product being offered is a set of services. (more…)

by DAN CALLOWAY
Published September 2, 2009; The Chronicler’s Web

WEAVERVILLE, NC – I am happy to announce that The Chronicler’s Web is growing in popularity on the W3.  More and more site visitors are flocking to our blogsite because they are able to take something away from it that has worth and value to them.  The news articles that we post are both informative and insightful as well as current and representative of “what’s happening and worth discussing.”  The blog articles offer both an entertaining and educational venue for our visitors that make them want to return for more.  And we’re glad they do.

Today marks the 40th day of the existence of “Blogging With Dan Calloway,” which evolved into “The Chronicler’s Web.”  The number of site visitors who visit us daily has more than tripled during this timeframe.

The Chronicler's Web

The Chronicler's Web

A recent survey was submitted to our site visitors asking them how they liked the Website and what they wanted to see more of, among other things.   Overwhelmingly, the response was, “We want to see more news.”  Others wanted more user-interactivity on the site.  Still others thought the site was perfect just the way it was and remarked that it was one of the better Websites that they had visited in quite some time.  We like that and want to continue to prove them right. (more…)

Tagged with:
 

Facebook has been in the hot seat this past week over claims that the social network has been letting third-party advertisers post people’s photos without permission, causing a flurry of conversation among confused users on both its site and Twitter. The buzz caught Facebook’s eye and prompted the company to put up a blog post this afternoon. Here was Facebook’s official response to these claims:

The advertisements that started these rumors were not from Facebook but placed within applications by third parties. Those ads violated our policies by misusing profile photos, and we already required the removal of those deceptive ads from third-party applications before this rumor began spreading.

Get Adobe Flash player

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline